Cameroon’s development context is complex, traditional project-based planning cannot address it anymore. To respond, UNDP Cameroon’s Accelerator Lab led a bold shift—embedding strategic foresight and portfolio approaches into the Country Programme Document (CPD). But for this to succeed, staff and partners needed new skills: horizon scanning, risk-to-opportunity mapping, and systems sensemaking. This wasn’t just a technical exercise; it was a capacity revolution for UNDP staff and partners, equipping them with tools and mindsets to anticipate change and manage complexity
Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation
December 11, 2025
Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.
The Learning Journey: From Awareness to Application
The Accelerator Lab designed a three-day immersive workshop to build these capabilities:
- Day 1 – Foundations: Teams learned the logic of portfolio approaches versus traditional programming. They practiced horizon scanning, identifying weak signals and emerging trends using STEEP-V frameworks.
- Day 2 – Application: Participants mapped risks and opportunities, then structured portfolios aligned with CPD priorities. They applied foresight tools like the Social Dynamics Iceberg Model to uncover root causes.
- Day 3 – Integration: Groups co-developed a roadmap for portfolio approach & foresight integration, complete with milestones, roles, and success indicators.
What emerged from the signals mapping?
- Economic: Youth unemployment and the informal sector’s expansion, digital infrastructure gaps, and financing constraints for MSMEs.
- Social: The Anglophone crisis and service delivery challenges, food insecurity, and GBV/SRH gaps.
- Environmental: Urban waste and plastic pollution, water scarcity, climate‑induced disasters, and infrastructure deficits.
Across responses, two critical risks for CPD design consistently ranked highest:
- Youth unemployment & informal sector expansion
- Infrastructure development gaps (especially for the energy transition)
From Insights to Action: Two Flagship Portfolios
The capacity-building process produced two transformative portfolios that respond to those top two identified risks:
1) Youth Employment Transformation
A. Strategic Statement – UNDP’s Role within the Cooperation Framework
UNDP will act as a convener and systems integrator with MINEFOP and MINEPAT to make the private sector the engine of decent youth employment. The role includes: (i) technical assistance on portfolio design and policy stress‑testing; (ii) crowding‑in finance and PPP facilitation for apprenticeships and first‑job schemes; (iii) institutionalizing labour‑market intelligence and career guidance; and (iv) embedding gender equality, inclusion, and digital M&E across the portfolio.
B. Programme Priorities & Desired Partnerships
- Programme priorities:
- Align TVET and vocational curricula with market demand; establish national career guidance and labour‑market analytics.
- Incentivize private sector job creation (apprenticeships, wage subsidies linked to retention, green/tech jobs).
- Strengthen inter‑ministerial coordination and rural–urban service equity.
- Desired partnerships & roles:
- Government: MINEFOP (lead on skills & employment), MINEPAT (economic policy/coordination), line ministries.
- Private sector & chambers: employer councils, on‑the‑job training, co‑design of competency standards.
- Universities/TVET & research: curriculum reform, tracer studies, foresight labs.
- CSOs & youth networks: outreach, inclusion of women and vulnerable groups, community feedback.
- IFIs/donors: blended finance for first‑job instruments and MSME growth.
C. Programme Management Components & Risk Management Framework
- Management components
- Portfolio approach: integrated projects under a single results logic (skills → matching → job creation → enterprise growth).
- Capacity building: training of trainers; set‑up of a national career guidance and labour‑market analysis function.
- Stakeholder engagement: employer roundtables; youth advisory panels; quarterly portfolio reviews.
- Innovation platforms: challenge funds for green/tech jobs; skills‑to‑work hackathons.
- Data & learning loops: use market analytics and tracer data to iteratively rebalance interventions.
- Key risks & mitigations
- Training–market mismatch: rolling curriculum updates; employer co‑assessment; modular micro‑credentials.
- Weak coordination / resistance to change: multidisciplinary risk & MEL committees; policy stress‑testing; change‑management plans.
- Unequal access (rural/urban): mobile training units; digital learning; location‑based quotas in incentive schemes.
- Partner misalignment: MoUs with shared KPIs; portfolio governance board.
D. Desired M&E Framework
- Architecture (building on national system): INS + administrative systems; single digital platform with interoperability across ministries; GIS‑enabled service maps.
- Measurement focus:
- Outcomes: youth employment/placement rate, retention at 6–12 months, earnings growth, % of green/tech jobs.
- System shifts: % of TVET programmes co‑designed with employers; time‑to‑curriculum update; coverage of career guidance services.
- Equity & inclusion: female youth placement; participation of vulnerable groups; rural access rates.
- Practices: quarterly CSO‑assisted data collection; employer satisfaction panels; public dashboards for transparency; learning briefs every two quarters to inform portfolio pivots.
Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.
2) Energy Transition Infrastructure
A. Strategic Statement – UNDP’s Role within the Cooperation Framework
As agreed in the workshop outputs: UNDP will act as a convener and integrator to accelerate the energy transition and close infrastructure gaps—leading the portfolio approach, providing technical assistance, strengthening governance and municipal capacities, mobilizing resources from donors/IFIs/private sector, and integrating digital M&E and transparency throughout implementation.
B. Programme Priorities & Desired Partnerships
- Programme priorities
- Modernize energy infrastructure nationwide—replace outdated/fuel‑based assets with renewables and efficiency technologies; ensure equitable access for rural and marginalized communities.
- Strengthen governance & transparency: capacity for municipalities and local authorities in M&E, risk management, and good governance; structured community participation.
- Mobilize resources & partnerships: develop PPP matchmaking platforms and policy incentives to attract investment; support domestic innovation.
- Integrate data & digital tools: reliable data systems and GIS‑based monitoring for planning and decision‑making.
- Desired partnerships & roles:
- Government entities: Ministry of Water & Energy; Ministry of Economy & Planning; municipalities (policy, development, coordination, local delivery).
- Development partners: UNDP, World Bank, IFIs (TA, capacity building, policy advocacy, finance).
- Private sector: energy companies, domestic innovators, PPP platforms (capex, technology deployment, co‑financing).
- Civil society: local NGOs/CBOs (community engagement, monitoring, inclusion).
- Academia/TVET: technical training, research, benchmarking.
- Donors & funds: bilateral/multilateral; National Decentralization Fund (financing, especially for rural infrastructure).
C. Programme Management Components & Risk Management Framework
- Management components
- Portfolio design & alignment with national energy and decentralization policies.
- Capacity building for municipalities, ministries, and private actors on governance, M\&E, and project management.
- Stakeholder engagement: annual Futures/Stakeholder Summits; structured CSO involvement.
- Innovation platforms: PPP matchmaking; hackathons for domestic energy solutions.
- Data & monitoring: GIS and digital tools for real‑time tracking; quarterly CSO data validation.
- Risk management framework
- Funding delays → diversify sources (IFIs/donors/PPP); phased delivery; contingency reserves.
- Political instability/policy shifts → policy stress‑testing; cross‑party briefings; portfolio safeguards.
- Technical capacity gaps/aging equipment → targeted training; vendor‑neutral standards; O\&M contracts.
- Corruption/weak accountability → transparency dashboards; community monitoring; independent audits.
- Community resistance → early engagement; benefit‑sharing; grievance redress mechanisms.
D. Desired M&E Framework
- Data tools: GIS mapping, online collection platforms, benchmarking studies, quarterly reporting with CSOs.
- Challenges acknowledged: long administrative validations; unreliable secondary data; limited community engagement; weak field infrastructure; skills gaps.
- Responses (“Rooms to Address”): integrate modern M\&E into government systems; budget lines for municipal data; transparency dashboards; peer‑learning on analytics.
- Capacity building needs: governance & M\&E for municipalities/mayors; GIS & data analytics; deep‑listening tools for communities; benchmarking exchanges.
- Illustrative indicators: households and facilities gaining reliable clean energy; outage frequency/duration; lifecycle cost per kWh; % projects with open data; citizen satisfaction with service quality; share of renewable generation in serviced areas.
The Roadmap: Sustaining Capacity Gains
The below co‑created road‑map for portfolio approach & foresight integration in CPD design, turns design into action and ensures learning translates into delivery:
- Policy stress‑testing workshops: Validate CPD portfolios against real‑world risks and political cycles.
- CPD draft & operational mechanisms: Translate foresight insights into governance instruments and budgeted plans.
- Portfolio design & validation: Facilitate technical development, quality assurance, and government validation.
- Corrective guidelines & M&E: Define contingency actions and embed monitoring routines with quarterly CSO engagement.
- High‑level roadmap validation & resource mobilization: Secure commitments from line ministries, FEICOM, IFIs, donors, and private sector to finance portfolio pilots and scale.
Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.
Action Pledges: Ownership Through Commitment
Participants made time-bound pledges—from capacity building and CPD drafting to donor engagement and PPP matchmaking. These pledges institutionalize foresight practices and portfolio logic across UNDP and partner systems and reflect co‑ownership.
Conclusion: Key Take Away
By embedding foresight and portfolio approaches into CPD design—and building capacity to sustain them—Cameroon is future-proofing development. This model shows that innovation is not just about technology; it’s about rethinking how we plan, collaborate, and learn. UNDP Cameroon’s Accelerator Lab didn’t just deliver documents—it built a culture of foresight and adaptive programming. This capacity shift ensures that Cameroon’s development strategy is resilient, inclusive, and ready for the future.
Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.