Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation

Cameroon’s development context is complex, traditional project-based planning cannot address it anymore. To respond, UNDP Cameroon’s Accelerator Lab led a bold shift—embedding strategic foresight and portfolio approaches into the Country Programme Document (CPD). But for this to succeed, staff and partners needed new skills: horizon scanning, risk-to-opportunity mapping, and systems sensemaking. This wasn’t just a technical exercise; it was a capacity revolution for UNDP staff and partners, equipping them with tools and mindsets to anticipate change and manage complexity

December 11, 2025
Group of diverse people posing for a photograph in a bright conference room.

Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.

UNDP Cameroon

The Learning Journey: From Awareness to Application

The Accelerator Lab designed a three-day immersive workshop to build these capabilities:

  • Day 1 – Foundations: Teams learned the logic of portfolio approaches versus traditional programming. They practiced horizon scanning, identifying weak signals and emerging trends using STEEP-V frameworks.
  • Day 2 – Application: Participants mapped risks and opportunities, then structured portfolios aligned with CPD priorities. They applied foresight tools like the Social Dynamics Iceberg Model to uncover root causes.
  • Day 3 – Integration: Groups co-developed a roadmap for portfolio approach & foresight integration, complete with milestones, roles, and success indicators.

 

What emerged from the signals mapping?

  • Economic: Youth unemployment and the informal sector’s expansion, digital infrastructure gaps, and financing constraints for MSMEs.
  • Social: The Anglophone crisis and service delivery challenges, food insecurity, and GBV/SRH gaps.
  • Environmental: Urban waste and plastic pollution, water scarcity, climate‑induced disasters, and infrastructure deficits.

Across responses, two critical risks for CPD design consistently ranked highest:

  1. Youth unemployment & informal sector expansion
  2. Infrastructure development gaps (especially for the energy transition)

 

From Insights to Action: Two Flagship Portfolios

The capacity-building process produced two transformative portfolios that respond to those top two identified risks:

1) Youth Employment Transformation

A. Strategic Statement – UNDP’s Role within the Cooperation Framework
UNDP will act as a convener and systems integrator with MINEFOP and MINEPAT to make the private sector the engine of decent youth employment. The role includes: (i) technical assistance on portfolio design and policy stress‑testing; (ii) crowding‑in finance and PPP facilitation for apprenticeships and first‑job schemes; (iii) institutionalizing labour‑market intelligence and career guidance; and (iv) embedding gender equality, inclusion, and digital M&E across the portfolio.

B. Programme Priorities & Desired Partnerships

  • Programme priorities:
    • Align TVET and vocational curricula with market demand; establish national career guidance and labour‑market analytics.
    • Incentivize private sector job creation (apprenticeships, wage subsidies linked to retention, green/tech jobs).
    • Strengthen inter‑ministerial coordination and rural–urban service equity.
  • Desired partnerships & roles:
    • Government: MINEFOP (lead on skills & employment), MINEPAT (economic policy/coordination), line ministries.
    • Private sector & chambers: employer councils, on‑the‑job training, co‑design of competency standards.
    • Universities/TVET & research: curriculum reform, tracer studies, foresight labs.
    • CSOs & youth networks: outreach, inclusion of women and vulnerable groups, community feedback.
    • IFIs/donors: blended finance for first‑job instruments and MSME growth.

C. Programme Management Components & Risk Management Framework

  • Management components
    • Portfolio approach: integrated projects under a single results logic (skills → matching → job creation → enterprise growth).
    • Capacity building: training of trainers; set‑up of a national career guidance and labour‑market analysis function.
    • Stakeholder engagement: employer roundtables; youth advisory panels; quarterly portfolio reviews.
    • Innovation platforms: challenge funds for green/tech jobs; skills‑to‑work hackathons.
    • Data & learning loops: use market analytics and tracer data to iteratively rebalance interventions.
  • Key risks & mitigations
    • Training–market mismatch: rolling curriculum updates; employer co‑assessment; modular micro‑credentials.
    • Weak coordination / resistance to change: multidisciplinary risk & MEL committees; policy stress‑testing; change‑management plans.
    • Unequal access (rural/urban): mobile training units; digital learning; location‑based quotas in incentive schemes.
    • Partner misalignment: MoUs with shared KPIs; portfolio governance board.

D. Desired M&E Framework

  • Architecture (building on national system): INS + administrative systems; single digital platform with interoperability across ministries; GIS‑enabled service maps.
  • Measurement focus:
    • Outcomes: youth employment/placement rate, retention at 6–12 months, earnings growth, % of green/tech jobs.
    • System shifts: % of TVET programmes co‑designed with employers; time‑to‑curriculum update; coverage of career guidance services.
    • Equity & inclusion: female youth placement; participation of vulnerable groups; rural access rates.
  • Practices: quarterly CSO‑assisted data collection; employer satisfaction panels; public dashboards for transparency; learning briefs every two quarters to inform portfolio pivots.
Two professionals sit at a desk with laptops and papers, focused.

Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.

UNDP Cameroon

2) Energy Transition Infrastructure

A. Strategic Statement – UNDP’s Role within the Cooperation Framework
As agreed in the workshop outputs: UNDP will act as a convener and integrator to accelerate the energy transition and close infrastructure gaps—leading the portfolio approach, providing technical assistance, strengthening governance and municipal capacities, mobilizing resources from donors/IFIs/private sector, and integrating digital M&E and transparency throughout implementation.

B. Programme Priorities & Desired Partnerships

  • Programme priorities
    • Modernize energy infrastructure nationwide—replace outdated/fuel‑based assets with renewables and efficiency technologies; ensure equitable access for rural and marginalized communities.
    • Strengthen governance & transparency: capacity for municipalities and local authorities in M&E, risk management, and good governance; structured community participation.
    • Mobilize resources & partnerships: develop PPP matchmaking platforms and policy incentives to attract investment; support domestic innovation.
    • Integrate data & digital tools: reliable data systems and GIS‑based monitoring for planning and decision‑making.
  • Desired partnerships & roles:
    • Government entities: Ministry of Water & Energy; Ministry of Economy & Planning; municipalities (policy, development, coordination, local delivery).
    • Development partners: UNDP, World Bank, IFIs (TA, capacity building, policy advocacy, finance).
    • Private sector: energy companies, domestic innovators, PPP platforms (capex, technology deployment, co‑financing).
    • Civil society: local NGOs/CBOs (community engagement, monitoring, inclusion).
    • Academia/TVET: technical training, research, benchmarking.
    • Donors & funds: bilateral/multilateral; National Decentralization Fund (financing, especially for rural infrastructure).

C. Programme Management Components & Risk Management Framework

  • Management components
    • Portfolio design & alignment with national energy and decentralization policies.
    • Capacity building for municipalities, ministries, and private actors on governance, M\&E, and project management.
    • Stakeholder engagement: annual Futures/Stakeholder Summits; structured CSO involvement.
    • Innovation platforms: PPP matchmaking; hackathons for domestic energy solutions.
    • Data & monitoring: GIS and digital tools for real‑time tracking; quarterly CSO data validation.
  • Risk management framework
    • Funding delays → diversify sources (IFIs/donors/PPP); phased delivery; contingency reserves.
    • Political instability/policy shifts → policy stress‑testing; cross‑party briefings; portfolio safeguards.
    • Technical capacity gaps/aging equipment → targeted training; vendor‑neutral standards; O\&M contracts.
    • Corruption/weak accountability → transparency dashboards; community monitoring; independent audits.
    • Community resistance → early engagement; benefit‑sharing; grievance redress mechanisms.

D. Desired M&E Framework 

  • Data tools: GIS mapping, online collection platforms, benchmarking studies, quarterly reporting with CSOs.
  • Challenges acknowledged: long administrative validations; unreliable secondary data; limited community engagement; weak field infrastructure; skills gaps.
  • Responses (“Rooms to Address”): integrate modern M\&E into government systems; budget lines for municipal data; transparency dashboards; peer‑learning on analytics.
  • Capacity building needs: governance & M\&E for municipalities/mayors; GIS & data analytics; deep‑listening tools for communities; benchmarking exchanges.
  • Illustrative indicators: households and facilities gaining reliable clean energy; outage frequency/duration; lifecycle cost per kWh; % projects with open data; citizen satisfaction with service quality; share of renewable generation in serviced areas.

 

The Roadmap: Sustaining Capacity Gains

The below co‑created road‑map for portfolio approach & foresight integration in CPD design, turns design into action and ensures learning translates into delivery:

  • Policy stress‑testing workshops: Validate CPD portfolios against real‑world risks and political cycles.
  • CPD draft & operational mechanisms: Translate foresight insights into governance instruments and budgeted plans.
  • Portfolio design & validation: Facilitate technical development, quality assurance, and government validation.
  • Corrective guidelines & M&E: Define contingency actions and embed monitoring routines with quarterly CSO engagement.
  • High‑level roadmap validation & resource mobilization: Secure commitments from line ministries, FEICOM, IFIs, donors, and private sector to finance portfolio pilots and scale.

 

Photograph of a female presenter with microphone in conference room, slide projected behind.

Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.

UNDP Cameroon

Action Pledges: Ownership Through Commitment

Participants made time-bound pledges—from capacity building and CPD drafting to donor engagement and PPP matchmaking. These pledges institutionalize foresight practices and portfolio logic across UNDP and partner systems and reflect co‑ownership.

 

Conclusion: Key Take Away

By embedding foresight and portfolio approaches into CPD design—and building capacity to sustain them—Cameroon is future-proofing development. This model shows that innovation is not just about technology; it’s about rethinking how we plan, collaborate, and learn. UNDP Cameroon’s Accelerator Lab didn’t just deliver documents—it built a culture of foresight and adaptive programming. This capacity shift ensures that Cameroon’s development strategy is resilient, inclusive, and ready for the future.

 

Colorful village market scene with huts, trees, people, bicycles, a pond, and distant hills.

Future-Proofing Development in Cameroon: How UNDP’s Accelerator Lab Built Capacity for Foresight and Portfolio Innovation.

UNDP Cameroon