Tools
 Diagnosing
 SWOT Analysis
 Current Approaches
 Key Stakeholders
 Potential Interventions
 Next
Defining a Domestic PSD Programme
Perform a Stakeholder Analysis to determine engagement and management strategy
Stakeholder
Potential Interest in UNDP programme
Influence Attitude towards UNDP
Strategy for engaging/ managing

IFC

HIGH – Potentially complementary to their focus on improving SME access to finance

HIGH – Government looks to them as primary provider of advice on PSD

NEUTRAL – Have not engaged much with UNDP in the past

Suggest cooperation on activities relating to creating value chain linkages

Ministry of Trade and Industry

HIGH –Interested in pushing private-sector led growth

HIGH – Primary entity responsible for domestic PSD issues

SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE – May view UNDP initiatives as competition for own PSD initiatives

Collaborate on helping to meeting PSD needs that are prioritized but not currently provided by Ministry

Ministry of Labor

HIGH – Interested in job creation potential of programme

MEDIUM – Entity responsible for enabling employment to support PSD initiatives

POSITIVE – Has worked well with UNDP on capacity building initiatives in the past

Collaborate on helping to link Ministries goals with PSD initiatives

National Chamber of Commerce

HIGH – Interest in additional market opportunities for members of National Chamber

LOW – Trust in private sector fairly low

POSITIVE – Has worked well with UNDP on initiatives in the past

Build capacity to organize and understand political landscape

Non-governmental Microfinance Institution

HIGH – Interest in additional opportunities for microfinance investments

LOW – Small impact both financially and politically

POSITIVE – Has worked well with UNDP on initiatives in microfinance

Leverage knowledge and expertise in microfinance to aid PSD initiatives

Source: Dalberg analysis