Stakeholder
|
Potential Interest in UNDP programme
|
Influence |
Attitude towards UNDP
|
Strategy for engaging/ managing
|
|
|
IFC
|
HIGH Potentially complementary to their focus
on improving SME access to finance
|
HIGH Government looks to them as primary provider
of advice on PSD
|
NEUTRAL Have not engaged much with UNDP in the
past
|
Suggest cooperation on activities relating to creating
value chain linkages
|
|
Ministry of Trade and Industry
|
HIGH Interested in pushing private-sector led
growth
|
HIGH Primary entity responsible for domestic
PSD issues
|
SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE May view UNDP initiatives
as competition for own PSD initiatives
|
Collaborate on helping to meeting PSD needs that are
prioritized but not currently provided by Ministry
|
|
Ministry of Labor
|
HIGH Interested in job creation potential of
programme
|
MEDIUM Entity responsible for enabling employment
to support PSD initiatives
|
POSITIVE Has worked well with UNDP on capacity
building initiatives in the past
|
Collaborate on helping to link Ministries goals with
PSD initiatives
|
|
National Chamber of Commerce
|
HIGH Interest in additional market opportunities
for members of National Chamber
|
LOW Trust in private sector fairly low
|
POSITIVE Has worked well with UNDP on initiatives
in the past
|
Build capacity to organize and understand political
landscape
|
|
Non-governmental Microfinance Institution
|
HIGH Interest in additional opportunities for
microfinance investments
|
LOW Small impact both financially and politically
|
POSITIVE Has worked well with UNDP on initiatives
in microfinance
|
Leverage knowledge and expertise in microfinance to
aid PSD initiatives
|
| Source: Dalberg
analysis |