PPPUE Header
Navigation Bar
 
Arrow

Overview

PPP Experience Exchange
PPP Consultant Roster
PPP Newsletter
Events

 

Professional Development
Collaborative Learning

 

Resource Facilitation
Case Studies
Project Database
Virtual Library
Working Paper Series
Conference Series
    Berlin 2000
    Bonn 1999
    Lima 1998
    Internet 1997/98
Links

 

Become a GLN Member!

Arrow

My GLN Account


Featured Content
PPPs and the poor
in water and sanitation


Search PPPUE

Search

PPPUE Conference Paper Series, Volume I
Internet Conference 1997/98

Round III

<previous> Chapter

Table of Contents

<previous> Section


Cross-Cutting Problem Areas for Public-Private Collaborations in Urban Environmental Services

For all environmental services:

  1. Rapid pace of change. In problems, populations, technologies. Requires effective, decentralized information services. Offers opportunities for leapfrogging to less resource intensive services.
  2. Political risks. Facing private involvement with governments, such as the pressure of election cycles, potential instability of new democracies, personal agendas of government officials, and the special status of some services (particularly access to water). Creates barriers to starting or maintaining collaborations.
  3. Pricing. Of environmental services. Not only is there insufficient information on life-cycle costs, the information that does exist is rarely incorporated into pricing structures. Subsidies and the political acceptability of higher prices are particular issues.
  4. Delivering services to the door. Particularly of the poor.
  5. Disparities in bargaining power. Undermine the ability to build effective, durable collaborations. Special issues exist between: (a) municipal governments and local service providers and (b) multinational service providers (particularly those promising significant private investment) and government officials.

For capital intensive services or monopoly providers:

  1. Short time horizons. Lead to unrealistic expectations or unsustainable solutions. Major institutional change (such as building regulatory capacity) and major private investments - both take time. Both are difficult to fit political cycles and the desire for immediate improvements in crisis conditions.
  2. Accessing operating experience and capital. Can obscure local capacities and limit the universe of potential service providers. Tremendous local operating experience already exists in many countries. Frequently, however, a handful of international service providers are seen as the only vehicle for bringing private capital to bear - and they are awarded the major contracts. Methods need to be found for decoupling operating experience and access to private capital, while building on local capabilities.
  3. Preparing governments for their new roles. Many governments are ill-prepared to be partners with private organisations, sophisticated consumers of what private firms can - and cannot - offer, or credible regulators of private activities. Ensuring that they can be effective partners in collaborations meeting basic social needs, as well as the individual goals of the other parties, is a key challenge.


<previous> Chapter

Table of Contents

<previous> Section;


Home  |  About PPPUE  | Innovative Partnership Grant  |  Global Learning Network


PPPUE Homepage PPPUE Programme Information PPPUE Country Activities PPPUE Global Learning Network PPPUE Homepage UNDP Homepage UN Homepage