Public Resource Management: Pro-Poor Domestic Resource Mobilization
In line with its support to Pro-Poor Public Investment, UNDP
advocates the need for enhanced domestic resource mobilization
to secure fiscal space for financing pro-poor expenditures and policies,
based on the following guidelines:
-
Achieving the MDGs requires a significant
increase in resources, or ‘scaling up’, to finance increased
investment - Most policy research and advice on fiscal
reform in the 1990s placed a strong emphasis on short-term macroeconomic
stability and fiscal solvency objectives (maintaining low inflation
and a manageable level of debt) that limited public spending. More
recently it has favored increased efficiency in tax collection and
administration and higher levels of foreign aid to finance incremental
public spending. UNDP advocates that in most countries these options
are not enough to finance the appropriate public investments needed
for long-term developmental returns. Domestic resources must also
be mobilized through taxation and domestic borrowing where appropriate.
-
Taxation - The international
financial institutions (IFIs) advocate a fiscal reform strategy
for developing countries based on trade liberalization and the implementation
of broad-based taxes on domestic activities, such as income and
consumption taxes, especially value-added tax (VAT). However evidence
has found that the VAT may be regressive rather than ‘revenue
neutral’, as taxing all consumption makes it relatively more
expensive for the poor. It is therefore important to analyze the
fiscal impact of the VAT especially the degree of tax incidence
or degree of regressive-ness. It is also crucial that countries
identify and analyze alternatives to the VAT.
-
Domestic Borrowing - Domestic
Borrowing (DB) may present a possible source of resource mobilization,
allowing savings to be realized for productive investment, although
it is often prohibited by strict and ill-designed conditionalities.
As domestic borrowing involves a transfer from the domestic private
sector to the domestic public sector, it does not directly increase
a country’s liabilities to the rest of the world. It can also
increase the propensity to save to the extent that such borrowing
reduces domestic consumption. It can, however, crowd out private
investment and have negative distributional implications, depending
on the country context, the fiscal situation and how the borrowing
is done. Therefore it is important to assess the net benefits of
domestic borrowing in determining its optimal magnitude.
-
Capacity Development. Public
Financial Management Reform is a necessary precondition for effective
budget management. However it does not represent a sufficient platform
to align budgets with development objectives, including the MDGs.
UNDP stresses the need to develop governments’ capacity to
analyze fiscal policy options and trade-offs. UNDP is centrally
involved in fiscal policy capacity building in China and Nigeria.
|