Like developing
countries, industrial countries also face numerous
challenges due to globalization. Increased demand for a
clean environment, food safety or improved international
peace and security are only some of the global public goods
that are supported by a very sizable constituency in these
countries. Increasingly, these countries—even the most
powerful or richest ones among them—find it difficult if
not impossible to produce public goods unilaterally. They
too have reason to view the proposals for enhancing
international cooperation in Providing Global Public
Goods with interest.
In addition,
"aid fatigue" in the industrialized world has
contributed to an increased push for a more effective
foreign aid program. Part of the challenge here is to
appropriately distinguish an emerging dual agenda in
international development policy today: aid and global
public goods. Providing Global Public Goods explains
how the former deals with the equity issue, while the latter
answers mainly to an efficiency issue. Thus, these are
complementary objectives and one should not be sacrificed in
favor of the other. Obfuscating these tools—that is,
financing global public goods provision with foreign aid—runs
the risk of failing both objectives. Lower foreign aid
deprives developing countries of much needed resources to
pursue their development plans, while aid financed global
public goods skews incentives for cooperation. (See also the
answer to question 18.) Developing a dual agenda for
international development policy—aid plus global public
goods—is therefore in the interest of the industrialized
world.