GEF guidance for programming National Adaptation Programmes
of Action (NAPA) is reflected in GEF/C.28/18
(May 12, 2006). In general, programming follows similar
principles of good practice for project design as described
under the SCCF. The LDCF and SCCF are distinct in the following
ways: the LDCF is eligible to Least Developed Countries
(LDCs) only; projects are focused on short-term, urgent
and priority needs; and projects are derived from the completed
NAPAs.
Objective: To support the (a) preparation
of National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs) for
identifying urgent and immediate adaptation needs in Least
Developed Countries; and (b) implementation of NAPAs.
Scope:
-
LDCs only;
-
Priority sectors likely to be water resources, agriculture,
coastal zones and health;
-
Development (not global environmental) benefits are
required;
-
Incremental reasoning required for medium- and full-sized
projects;
-
Policy paper under development (October/November 2005).
Activities:
Preparation and implementation of NAPAs.
Outcomes:
Implementation of priority adaptation strategies.
Outputs:
Innovation:
Portfolio mix:
Incremental reasoning: Incremental reasoning
required for medium- and full-sized projects.
Monitoring and evaluation:
Cost sharing: The recommended co-financing
ratios for LDCF projects are:
Note: It is recommended that
PDF-A funds (50K) are utilized for preparation of the project
brief/document in cases where the completed NAPA is comprehensive
and implementation can commence within a very short time.
PDF-B funds (350K) should be utilized in cases where, although
the NAPA has been completed, there is a need for substantial
input in order to prepare a priority project for implementation.
Please consult with the RCU/HQ to determine if PDF-A or
PDF-B funds should be utilized for preparing NAPA priority
projects for implementation.