Goal 14: Life Below Water
The world ocean contributes substantially to human development, including to the provision of food security, transport, energy supply, tourism and many of the planet’s most critical ecosystem services (such as carbon and nutrient cycling, climate regulation, and oxygen production). The ocean contributes around US$3 trillion per year to the global market economy, or about 5 percent of GDP. Estimates of the value of ocean non-market services run at about 63 percent of all such services provided by the planet’s ecosystems.
Fisheries and aquaculture contribute US$100 billion per year and about 260 million jobs to the global economy. Women comprise 47 percent of the total workforce dependent on commercial capture fisheries for their livelihoods, including the post-harvest sector. International shipping moves over 90 percent of international trade. Thirty percent of global oil extraction occurs in offshore waters, valued at approximately US$900 billion per year and increasing. Tourism represents 10 percent of global GDP and about 10 percent of global jobs; with coastal tourism being a major component.
The integrity of ocean values and services is at significant risk due to a range of ocean management policy and market failures leading to overexploitation of fisheries, pollution, introduction of invasive species, habitat loss and ocean acidification. Ninety percent of global fish stocks are fully exploited or overexploited. Nutrient loads to the oceans have tripled since preindustrial times, leading to a geometric increase in coastal hypoxic areas, now numbering over 500. The rapid growth of the shipping industry has led to an explosion of introduced aquatic species carried via ship ballast water and hulls. Twenty percent of the world’s coral reefs have already been lost and another 20 percent degraded. Mangroves have been reduced to over 30 percent of their historical cover and 29 percent of seagrass habitats have disappeared since the late 1800s. Of the 300 million tons per year of global plastics production, an estimated 10 million to 20 million tons is entering the oceans and damaging species and ecosystems. Lastly, due to human CO2 emissions, the oceans are acidifying rapidly, perhaps faster than ever before, with ocean acidity increasing by 30 percent over the last 50 years and already starting to impair the functioning and integrity of ocean ecosystems.
Each year, overfishing and unsustainable practices generate economic losses valued at about US$83 billion, coastal hypoxia casues losses of US$200 billion to US$800 billion, damage from invasive aquatic species is valued at US$100 billion and damage from ocean plastics is valued at US$13 billion. In the "business as usual" climate change response scenario, ocean acidification will cost US$1.2 trillion per year by 2100 as ocean acidity increases an additional 250 percent.
Financing Life Below Water
Actions to achieve SDG target 14.5-10 percent of oceans under protection-are alone estimated to require at least a US$28 billion one-time public investment and about $21 billion a year thereafter. The costs to avert continued ocean acidification, which is directly linked to cogent action on climate change mitigation under the Paris Agreement, most certainly run into the trillions. While reforming the annual US$16 billion in harmful fisheries subsidies could be construed as a cost, it could also be converted to a benefit if these public funds were instead invested in improved fisheries management, sustainable aquaculture and marine protected areas.
Beyond domestic public finance, “blue” financing has thus far been provided by international Official Development Assistance, including through grants and loans from development banks and bilateral and multilateral donors. Other successful solutions have emerged: for example, tradeable fisheries rights were effective, through the Parties to the Nauru Agreement PNA Vessel Day Scheme at mobilizing large scale funding in relation to tuna conservation in the Pacific. Governments, especially those in tourist destinations, are generating increasing revenues from payments for ecosystem services to fund and protect marine conservation projects. Conservation trust funds such as the Caribbean Biodiversity Fund are attracting new investment sources and are used to support activities implemented by local communities.
Other promising new funding mechanisms such as blue bonds and the re-emergence of debt-for-nature swaps offer new opportunities. Impact investment in the fisheries sector will bring expertise and capital to promote a shift to sustainable practices.
Financing solutions related to SDG 14
The solutions listed below provide a wide range of finance options to significantly increase resources that can help sustain our terrestrial legacy. These reviews do not however constitute an exhaustive or comprehensive list of financing options for SDG 14.
Measurable conservation outcomes resulting from actions that compensate for significant residual adverse biodiversity impacts arising from development projects.
Systematic search for biochemical and genetic information in nature in order to develop commercially-valuable products and applications.
Approach for projects, organizations, entrepreneurs, and startups to raise money for their causes from multiple individual donors or investors.
Debt for Nature Swaps
Agreement that reduces a developing country’s debt stock or service in exchange for a commitment to protect nature.
Disaster Risk Insurance
Disaster risk insurance schemes cover—against a premium—the costs incurred by the insured entity from extreme weather and natural disasters.
Ecological Fiscal Transfers
Integrating ecological services means making conservation indices (e.g. size/quality of protected areas) part of the fiscal allocation formula to reward investments in conservation.
Enterprise Challenge Funds
Funding instrument that distributes grants (or concessional finance) to profit-seeking projects on a competitive basis.
Environmental Trust Funds
Legal entity and investment vehicle to help mobilizing, blending, and overseeing the collection and allocation of financial resources for environmental purposes.
Bonds where proceeds are invested exclusively in projects that generate climate or other environmental benefits.
Investments made with the intention to generate a measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.
Governments and civil society groups use lotteries as a means of raising funds for benevolent purposes such as education, health, preservation of historic sites and nature conservation.
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Payments for ecosystem services (PES) occur when a beneficiary or user of an ecosystem service makes a direct or indirect payment to the provider of that service.
Social and Development Impact Bonds (Results-Based Financing)
A public-private partnership that allows private (impact) investors to upfront capital for public projects that deliver social and environmental outcomes in exchange for a financial interest.
Taxes on Pesticides and Chemical Fertilizers
Taxes on certain pesticides and chemical fertilizers can mobilize fiscal revenues while mitigating the negative effects associated with pesticide/fertilizers application and promoting sustainable agriculture practices.
Taxes on Renewable Natural Capital (water; timber)
Any fee, charge or tax charged on the extraction and/or use of renewable natural capital (e.g. timber or water).
Voluntary Standards (finance)
Standards applicable to the financial sector that capture good practices and encourage the achievement and monitoring of social and environmental outcomes.
The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) is a UNDP-managed global partnership that supports countries to enhance their financial management for biodiversity and ecosystems. BIOFIN has developed an online catalogue with a comprehensive list instruments, tools and strategies that are applicable to SDG 14 and 15. For more information, please visit BIOFIN Finance Solutions.
How to tackle various forms of risk – from extreme weather events to commodity price shocks, disease outbreaks and over-indebtedness – was high on the agenda of the 2017 Financing for Development (FfD) Forum at the UN. it is unsurprising there is renewed interest in financial instruments and innovations designed to reduce vulnerability to risk – and to help countries cope when crises occur.Read more
Bankrolling sustainable development cannot happen through global financing agendas alone, but should instead be built from a bottom-up, holistic and context-driven approach. As countries strive to manage increasingly complex financing flows at the national level, as domestic public and private resources increase, and as the sources of external resources diversify, we need urgent and targeted solutions.Read more
As it is the International Year of Sustainable Tourism, it is worth noting the role biodiversity and ecosystems play as the backbone of tourism in many places, and the crucial role that the tourism sector can play in conserving biodiversity. This is undeniably a nexus to pursue, particularly for financing effective conservation. Read more
Current domestic resources and ODA combined will be insufficient to finance the 2030 Agenda. Against this background, the 48 Least Developed Countries’ abilities to harness and make effective use of a broader suite of financing instruments to fund their sustainable development becomes a development imperative.Read more